Monthly Archives: May 2022

Canada to ban China’s Huawei and ZTE from its 5G networks

Reading Time: 3 minutes
The Huawei logo at a trade show.

Canada says it will ban two of China’s biggest telecoms equipment makers from working on its 5G phone networks.

The restrictions against Huawei and ZTE were announced by the country’s industry minister on Thursday. Francois-Philippe Champagne says the move will improve Canada’s mobile internet services and “protect the safety and security of Canadians”. But Huawei Canada said it was “disappointed” by the decision, which it said was “political”.

“This is an unfortunate political decision that has nothing to do with cyber security or any of the technologies in question,” a statement said.

Several nations – including the UK, US, Australia and New Zealand – have already put restrictions on the firms.

The four countries, along with Canada, make up an intelligence-sharing arrangement named “Five Eyes”. It evolved during the Cold War as a mechanism for monitoring the Soviet Union and sharing classified information.

Canada’s announcement was widely expected, as its allies had already barred Huawei and ZTE from their own high-speed networks. 

Speaking to reporters in the Canadian capital of Ottawa, Mr Champagne said the decision came after “a full review by our security agencies and consultation with our closest allies”.

“Let me be very clear: We will always protect the safety and security of Canadians and will take any actions necessary to safeguard our telecommunication infrastructure,” he added.

“In a 5G world, at a time where we rely more and more in our daily lives [on] our network, this is the right decision.”

A spokesperson for the Chinese embassy in Ottawa told the Reuters news agency that Beijing sees the security concerns raised by Canada as a “pretext for political manipulation”.

The spokesperson for China also accused Canada of working with the US to suppress Chinese companies.

The Chinese embassy in Ottawa did not immediately respond to BBC requests for comment.

Huawei Canada said its equipment had been “closely scrutinised” by the government and security agencies, and added there had been “zero security incidents caused by Huawei equipment”.

“Banning Huawei’s equipment and services will lead to significant economic loss in Canada and drive up the cost of communications for Canadian consumers,” a statement said.

“Unfortunately, this decision is beyond our control as a business. However, we will do everything in our capacity to protect the legitimate rights and interests of our customers, partners, and ourselves.”

Meanwhile, ZTE said it rejected the “premise” of the Canadian government’s announcement, saying it was “highly speculative”.

“We have always abided by international standards and best practices, opening up our cyber security labs to enable regulators and stakeholders to verify the security of ZTE products,” the firm said.

The Canadian government’s decision means that telecoms firms in country will no longer be allowed to use equipment made by Huawei and ZTE. 

Companies that have already installed the equipment made by the Chinese manufacturers must now remove it, Mr Champagne said. 

Canada first announced a review of Huawei equipment in September 2018.

Some of China’s biggest technology and telecoms firms have been targeted in recent years by governments in the US and other Western nations over national security concerns.

In November, US President Joe Biden signed legislation that stops companies judged to be security threats from receiving new telecoms equipment licences in the country.

It means equipment from Huawei, ZTE and three other Chinese companies are banned for use in US telecoms networks.

Tagged ,

Advancements in online meetings

Reading Time: 2 minutes

Nowadays we are using different online modes of communication significantly more often. The software providing these solutions for collaboration is constantly improving and introducing new features.

Different companies and tools

There are many different tools for online meetings organization available on the market. They are used by various organizations like companies or universities. One of the solutions is Skype. It is owned by Microsoft. Skype offers a variety of possibilities for users. Its features include: online meetings with audio and video, recording the meetings, live subtitles, screen sharing, and messaging options. What is more, it can be used on different devices like mobile phones, tablets, or computers. The solution provided by Google is called Google Meet. It is one of the applications in the package of Google account. This solution offers the possibility to organize online meetings. Interesting features include the possibility to share the link to the meeting and integration with Google Calendar. Another provider of online meeting software is Zoom. It has a range of specific solutions for different situations and events. They can be for example for regular meetings, webinars, events, or creating whiteboards. These proposed options can be used in various industries like finance, education, and government.

Zoom Logo

Microsoft Teams

Another solution owned by Microsoft is Microsoft Teams. It is also offering the possibility of making online meetings. It includes many features like chats, meetings recording, and sharing files. Microsoft recently announced an incoming new feature. It is called Live Share. It will enable participants of the meeting to edit things together during the meeting, inside the Microsoft Teams app. Until now it was only possible to share the screen and present it to other users. Live Share feature brings more interactive collaboration to meetings. This feature is being built with Microsoft Fluid Framework. Lastly, the developers from different companies are also trying to help to create Live Share. The supporting companies include Accenture, Hexagon, Frame.io, and more.

A new feature like this, is the next step in enhancing efficient work online with the team. It is a chance to make work easier and more enjoyable.

Microsoft Teams

References

https://www.theverge.com/2022/5/24/23137619/microsoft-teams-live-share-developers-apps-build-2022

https://www.fastcompany.com/90754644/microsoft-teams-live-share-build

https://www.engadget.com/microsoft-teams-live-share-collaboration-155436857.html

https://www.windowscentral.com/software-apps/microsoft-teams-live-share-will-let-you-collaborate-in-real-time-across-apps

https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/office/produce-a-live-event-using-teams-591bd694-121d-405c-b26d-730315e45a22

https://zoom.us

https://www.skype.com/pl/

https://meet.google.com

https://www.microsoft.com/pl-pl/microsoft-teams/group-chat-software

Photos:

https://apps.apple.com/pl/app/zoom-cloud-meetings/id546505307?l=pl

https://www.microsoft.com/pl-pl/microsoft-teams/teams-for-work

Smart cities – dream of future or surveillance horror?

Reading Time: 3 minutes
Gandhinagar smart city's integrated central command and control goes fully  operational, Government News, ET Government

The idea that technology is reshaping every aspect of life is not a revolutionary statement anymore – rather a common knowledge across society. Recently, we experienced numerous technological advancements in the scope of livelihood and city improvement. Among many inventions, we can enlist things like autonomous cars, boldly introduced to the mainstream market by Tesla, or light sensors which allow for efficient utilization of energy in the buildings. 

By leveraging all these technological incentives, around 10 years ago, the concept of smart cities emerged on the horizon as an idea to make it easier for people to live in urban areas. As the foundation for developing such solutions, policymakers and tech enthusiasts picked the interconnection of the Internet of Things (IoT) – mostly sensors – and “urban” artificial intelligence algorithms. The reasoning behind those technologies comes from the IoT’s possibility to gather profound loads of data, whereas AI usage allows for its processing and development of further analysis, conclusions, and eventual recommendations. 

Before we go further, it is worthwhile to unpack the term “urban AI” as it will be necessary to understand the lining of presented inventions. As an example of it, we can analyze lamp posts packed with sensors and cameras which allow for intelligent light adjustment based on current weather, luminosity, and traffic. Each day when you go down a highway, the AI algorithm learns about the city and captures different urban features such as rush hours, sundown, or weather forecasts. By processing this information and historical data, urban AI implemented within this solution allows for adjusting the lamp posts in the most optimal way and the most sustainable one. Not only does such action can prevent possible accidents on the road due to the correct lighting, but also provide the city with savings based on leveraging daily sunlight. 

With the promise of improving functionalities, sustainability, and mobility, the concept of smart cities quickly became a buzzword under which many towns are now being developed. Analyzing the technological and regulatory framework, we can admit that there is still no chance of developing a completely self-maintaining city thanks to the introduced IoT, however, traveling around the world we can spot major improvements. As one of the best examples of a smart city, we can list Copenhagen which utilizes “wireless data from mobile devices, GPS in buses, and sensors in sewers and garbage cans to assess the state of the city in real-time and make improvements to decrease traffic, air pollution, and CO2 emissions.”

However, looking at those sensors and the loads of data they gather, we should also reflect on the possible dark side of smart cities. The regulatory framework is still not developed in many areas such as data protection and processing. This can cause ethical and legal dilemmas regarding who can access these databases and whether the government should have such profound access to the daily life of its citizens. The implementation of face recognition and sensors all over the city could actually provide information on your daily routine, who you meet up with, and where you go. As an interesting example of analysis of such data by the government, we can mention Social Credit System introduced in China. Is there a possibility that this practice will extend to Western countries with the bright idea of increasing cities’ sustainability by making them smart?

References:

Tagged

The Z-Event the charity event 2.0 ?

Reading Time: 2 minutes

In our world where the Internet is growing more and more, that the audiences of television are migrating to streaming platforms and especially Twitch, our new concepts, projects appear. This is the case of the Z-Event, if you do not know what the Z-Event is this article is for you.

The Z-Event is a charity event, on the streaming platform Twitch. Created by Adrien Nougaret called “Zerator”, a French Twitch streamer. The concept is to invite many important French Internet personalities, such as youtubers, influencers, French streamers, to stream during a whole weekend with all the benefits going to an association. For example, during the 2021 edition, the funds collected were donated to the association “Fight against Hunger”. This event reached records last year with more than 10 million euros collected. In France, it is a national event for Internet users.

Before addressing the monetary aspect, I will first show you some figures representing this event on the 2021 edition.

We can see that these are audience records for the French-speaking market which is relatively limited. In total during this 2021 edition, 52 streamers were present. But how did they manage to collect these 10 million euros over a weekend?

The economic model is based on the donations of the “Viewers”, that is to say that each of the streamers establishes a “sub-goal”, that is to say a special event when they reach a certain amount of money fixed by each streamer which can be reached either by subscriptions to the channel or pure donations of money. The events can be diverse and varied, ranging from a boxing match to an atypical haircut. The goal is to call for donations. And it works because with 10 million euros collected in one weekend, the objective is more than reached.

If we look at the evolution of the Z-Event since its creation in 2016, we can clearly see a progression in the money collected.

This raises new questions, could it be the youth telethon? Will the Z-Event be international? And how much money will be raised? Will influencers/Streamers from other countries create an event like this?

There are many questions we don’t have answers to yet, but only time will tell.

Sources :

https://zevent.fr

https://escharts.com/tournaments/marathon/z-event-2021https://www.lavoixdunord.fr/1092550/article/2021-11-01/zevent-2021-plus-de-10-millions-d-euros-recoltes-au-profit-d-action-contre-la

The future of lab grown meat

Reading Time: < 1 minute

With an increasing demand for agricultural products and awareness of global warming, lab grown meat is becoming an increasingly popular alternative to the traditional livestocks such as chickens and cow. Emerging technologies are also seeking to create the next generation of more advanced realistic plant based substitutes.

What is lab grown meat?

Lab grown meat, is cultivated in the lab from ready animal muscle and fat cells, removing the need for physical farmland, feed and reproduction of animals. Investors see the potential and has invested largely into research efforts as it helps to encourage more environmental-friendly efforts. Currently, plant based meats such as Beyond and Vatuatuib are the environmentally products, it will not be long before see lab grown meat hit the supermarkets.

Challenges with lab grown meat

While lab grown meats do reduce the carbon emissions and the space used for farming, the current technology is not cost effective. Newer technologies would be needed to produce cost effective for it to be made commercially available to the masses.

Should Cancel Culture Be Cancelled?

Reading Time: 2 minutes

Cancel culture is now a term that many of us who have been on the internet long enough are familiar with. For those who are unaware, cancel culture refers to the type of ostracism and shame one faces when they are called out publicly for their misdoings, be it online on social media platforms or in person. The goal of “cancelling” someone is to typically hold them accountable for their words or actions, and often some type of response and consequence is expected from them, such as them being relieved of duty from their current job, or a sincere, public apology at the very least. Whether you have been “cancelled” before or participated in the act of “cancelling” someone, everyone can agree that this culture is one that is highly controversial.

An article by Vice kicks off this debate by rallying for the benefits that cancel culture has brought about, its main argument being that “it’s a way for marginalized communities to publicly assert their value systems through pop culture.” This works especially well for people who hold high positions of power, such as politicians and celebrities, as the fear of being removed from their power or loss of support from their hundreds and thousands of fans would incentivise them to at least administer a public apology. However, this raises a whole issue altogether, which is whether the person being “cancelled” is truly apologetic, or whether they are still set in their own ways but have to apologise anyway to prevent themselves from being “cancelled.” Hence, the article states that whether cancel culture is truly effective or not is uncertain, but it is our best bet in “mobiliz[ing] people and direct intentions toward better legislative possibilities.”

However, I am more inclined to believe that cancel culture has done more damage than good, and should be done away with. After all, what good is a public apology if it is not truly sincere? Furthermore, the harm from cancel culture can be seen from when the effects of “cancelling” head in a more serious and fatal direction. An example of this was when the Boston Marathon bomber was wrongly identified by users on Reddit as then 26 year old Sunil Tripathi. Not only was he was wrongly accused, but he was cyberbullied mercilessly everday, with thousands of strangers sending him hateful messages and death threats. Eventually, the public received what they wanted as Sunil Tripathi eventually committed suicide before it was eventually discovered that he was not the bomber after all. With that, those who took part in the cancellation received no consequences while an innocent life was lost in the process.

When it comes to cancel culture, it is extremely harmful when people do not know the full context of things, and are ready to roll with the mob mentality, their pitchforks raised. An article by Psychology Today sums up the detriments and toxicity of cancel culture which I agree with, as instead of discussing different opinions, people are getting “cancelled” for having opinions which differ from the majority group or the group which is most vocal. This is also detrimental because the act of doing so forces people to conform with the majority, leaving little room for intellectual debates and discussions when so many people are quick to “cancel” someone. If this persists, sooner or later, we would all just be bricks in the wall, following the social norm out of fear of being “cancelled”. Hence with that, I believe it is time to #CancelCancelCulture.

New NVIDIA AI image reconstruction revolution, next step into Metaverse.

Reading Time: 2 minutes

During the Covid-19 pandemic, throughout the lonely time we have spent, everybody had a moment of reflection concerning the current economic status, global warming, and what is going to be the next step for humanity. While that thought kept our minds busy, Artificial Intelligence has proven to be more and more effective and even an average Joe can now wonder about new possibilities/capabilities of this technology

Recently NVIDIA released a new paper about “Extracting Triangular 3D Models, Materials, and Lightning From Images” and it is spectacular. Only one image or compound of images is enough for the new AI to replicate an object into a virtual one in an unexpectedly small amount of time. Earlier models were only capable of recreating geometry, while this one is so precise it also recreates the small details of an image, including colors and textures and even dynamic lightning if put into virtual space! Though it is not very precise in little details in a small amount of time, rendering lasting hours can give us amazing and detailed results.

It is even more exciting when we get to know that while the image is transferred into virtual space and despite being able to control dynamic lightning that interacts with AI sampled object when put into physics simulation engine, we have the possibility to change the material, textures and make it to interact with other physical objects as well as the lightning! Secondly, we can actively change the properties of such objects. Absolutely incredible.

Absolutely such technology with 5G internet, gives us possibilities of live generated physical objects into virtual/augmented reality or so-called metaverse. Tough technology concerning the visual and immersive effects has a long way to improve, we are getting closer and closer to virtual reality becoming normalized to the average citizen

https://research.nvidia.com/publication/2021-11_extracting-triangular-3d-models-materials-and-lighting-images
Tagged

GOOGLE IS GOING BANKRUPT?

Reading Time: 2 minutes

Not the header you expected to see, right? Who would even think that the giant of the Internet every now and then will suddenly go away in 2022?

Well, I should admit that there has been a clickbait used:) To be fair, Google stays with us for a bit more and don’t even plan to announce bankruptcy…in some countries. Recently, it has been declared that the company filed bankruptcy in russia. What was the reason for that?

As it is known, right after russia invaded Ukraine, majority of the world-leading companies stopped their activity on the territory of the terrorist country. Google, in its turn, suspended all the advertisement and selling of cloud-computing services in March 2022.

“Google told the Financial Times the seizure of its account had “made it untenable for our Russia office to function, including employing and paying Russian-based employees, paying suppliers and vendors and meeting other financial obligations”

However, the tech giant decided to continue to provide russians with its services (those free of charge). It includes Android, Play, Google Search, YouTube, Gmail and Maps. In addition to this, Google offered to its russian employees to help getting out of the country, providing them with a job in another country’s office. Those who disagreed -> are left without job now though.

Google explained its decision to leave free service as the only opportunity for russian people to “have a window” to the civilized world and read quality information and news.

To be honest, for me, as for Ukrainian , the situation is a bit controversial. From the one side, company tries to save its human capital, remain loyal despite any obstacles, and still hopes to come back to such a big market after the war is over and everything becomes stabilized. On the other hand, such actions, especially from such influential companies like Google, put the brakes on russian’s isolation which is the only “peaceful” leverage from the world to stop the genocide of Ukraine.

What do you think? What would YOU do being on the place of Google’s decision-makers?

Google declares itself bankrupt in Russia - Gizchina.com

References:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2022/05/18/google-russia-bankruptcy/

https://www.ft.com/content/9f4faa67-9057-4270-9e8c-f247ffc21f78

GameFi Or How to make money by playing Blockchain games.

Reading Time: 2 minutes

What is GameFi?

GameFi is a variety of blockchain-based gaming platforms. The first games of this type appeared in 2013, but over time they began to gain popularity rapidly. But the rise in popularity came in September 2021, and in August of that year, GameFi’s platforms experienced a real boom. For example, the developers of one of the most popular games, Axie Infinity, made over $1.2 billion in revenue.

How does it work?

In blockchain-based games, characters are NFTs (non-fungible tokens). Players have an option to create their own unique characters or buy existing characters, pump them up and sell them. Payment is made in the cryptocurrency of the platform on which the game is based. Moreover, in some games, you can bet on the outcome of battles. In order to sign up for such a game, you need a crypto wallet. Since most GameFi platforms adhere to the Play-to-Learn principle. However, you should study in detail the project where you are going to register and transfer the funds. The internal tokens of the most popular games have already moved beyond their platforms and are traded on cryptocurrency exchanges. The GameFi industry is gaining momentum due to the dynamic development of the decentralized platform and gaming segment. Some game tokens are even accepted in regular shops, such as Smooth Love Potion (SLP) in the Philippines. 

Benefits and potential risks. What is behind the scene?

Despite the fact that some token games have started to be accepted in regular shops, the Philippine authorities have voiced their concerns and are going to regulate a special tax on SLP transactions. This means that such transactions are not sustainable and should be treated with caution. There are many scammers online who create such gaming platforms posing as blockchain games, which are actually pyramid schemes. Experts note that some GameFi platforms are currently undervalued and lag behind the general development trend. According to analysts, the FaraLand and IG Gold platforms are expected to boom in the near future. Experts predict the further development of the decentralized gaming market. However, the value of tokens can fluctuate significantly under the influence of the bitcoin exchange rate, which makes it very risky. It is well known that the entire market depends on the movement of the first cryptocurrency. This could mean that if bitcoin collapses, GameFi projects are likely to collapse as well. In the near future, there will probably be resources (metaverses) where it will be possible to enter with a leveraged NFT character and compete with characters from other games. There will also be entire virtual markets where players can sell or buy everything they need.

Summary

GameFi’s blockchain-based gaming platforms are rapidly gaining popularity. However, such innovative technologies can have both upsides and downsides. It all depends on the risk the consumer is willing to take and the benefit he or she can derive from it.


Resources:


https://chaindebrief.com/axie-infinitys-1-2-billion-annualized-revenue-overtakes-candy-crushs-2020-total-revenue/

https://vc.ru/crypto/296459-chto-zhe-takoe-gamefi-ili-kak-zarabotat-igraya

https://www.binance.com/ru/blog/nft/что-такое-gamefi-преимущества-и-недостатки-как-получать-доход-421499824684903167

Tagged ,

R.I.P iPod

Reading Time: 2 minutes

Unless you were born yesterday you probably heard about the iPod or maybe you even owned one of the many models that Apple released.

Say Hello To iPod | 1000 songs in your pocket

The story of the iPod starts in 2001 when the first model was launched and ends, well, seemingly late – in 2019. However, I feel that the iPod has been slowly ‘dying’ over the last 10 years. With technology development, more storage is available on our phones than on the first iPod. It is said on BBC News that, ‘ the first iPod […] could store 1,000 tracks’. It might have been a big number in 2001 but nowadays we can access millions of songs on popular streaming platforms like Spotify or Apple Music.

However, what I believe is worth mentioning is the impact the iPod had on our culture and the way we think about music, and how we listen to it. As mentioned in the BBC News article, in the early 2000s the music industry was faced with a massive issue of illegally downloading music and sharing it. The article suggests that the issue was somewhat solved with the development of the first iPod as well as iTunes.

What else did the iPod revolutionize? In my opinion, it made music more available to its users. You no longer needed a cassette or a cd – you had all you needed in one small and simple to use the device. After all, the simplicity and the easy-to-use UI is what attracts people to Apple products.

To sum up, I believe that the iPod was a great product in the 2000s and early 2010s. However, with technological development, there is no longer a need for a device like the iPod.

Were you surprised that new iPods were still launched till 2019? What are your thoughts on the topic?

Resources: