All John Connors should immediately go into hiding. Yes, the Terminator might have just become a reality with San Francisco allowing police to deploy robots that kill. Oh boy, does this pose some serious concerns about privacy and ethics…
Known for its eclectic population, iconic landmarks, and its status as an epicenter for innovation & technology, it is no doubt that San Francisco has played an important role in the development of robotics & artificial intelligence. The city is home to multiple technology companies and research establishments that are constantly working on cutting-edge technologies, including the development of robots that are skilled at performing mixed tasks.
However, the use of robots and AI has raised concerns about their potential impact on society and the economy. One particularly controversial topic is the development of “killer robots,” or autonomous weapons systems that are designed to use deadly force without human intervention.
It all started 6 years ago when a robot in Dallas was used to kill a shooter by attaching C-4s to its arm and detonating it as it reached the location of the shooter¹.
Critics argue that killer robots could be used to carry out military operations or carry out assassinations, and could potentially be used to commit war crimes. There are also concerns about the potential for these weapons to be hacked or used against their creators. Can you really trust a robot to save you? Is San Francisco really comfortable with putting the lives of their citizens to a robot that doesn’t even have moral values? What if such a situation arises “when risk of loss of life to members of the public or officers is imminent and officers cannot subdue the threat after using alternative force options or de-escalation tactics²” (Boyette, 2022), could you really trust a robot NOT to hurt someone other than the target, ie people dying in the crossfire, accidentally or otherwise, due to the robot’s aiming function being inaccurate or due to the robot malfunctioning in other areas? What if the robot misidentifies the target, for example, in the case of identical twins where they share a significant amount of the same DNA?
On the other hand though, if these lethal robots are manufactured and used correctly, they can indeed be used in situations where the threat is imminent and officers are unable to subdue the threat. What’s more, it will remove officers from the line of fire and prevent them from acting on the situation directly, removing them from harm’s way. It will also leave officers to attend to other, less serious, and demanding calls/crimes, although I doubt that will happen, given the fact that if a robot is required to neutralize the threat, you should have officers on the scene.
Another point I’d like to make is that these robots are far from making the job of officers obsolete, as they can never replicate the moral values we have and follow, and the “gut feeling” we get or the “instincts” we have to make the right decision. And I’m confident that most of us do not want our lives to be in the hands of a robot, or at least an unsupervised robot, ie not having a human presence alongside it or guiding it at the very least.
Furthermore, this would just make killing easier for the police and some police departments abuse their power over their citizens already so this would just make the citizens even more afraid. Also, the officers can deploy these robots even when it’s not needed (waste of resources) or can deploy these robots before even trying to subdue the threat themselves in the regular way that officers often do and this can be a threat as the officers can slowly start to resort to this option ONLY in cases involving guns, for example, as they would see it as an “imminent threat” and would rather use a robot than risk their own life.

The development of killer robots has sparked a debate about the ethical implications of AI and the role of humans in the decision-making process. Some argue that the development of these weapons should be strictly regulated or banned, while others believe that they could potentially be used for defensive purposes.
Regardless of one’s stance on the issue, it is clear that the development of killer robots is a complex and controversial topic that raises important ethical and moral questions about the role of technology in society. As a leader in AI and robotics, San Francisco will undoubtedly play a key role in shaping the future of these technologies.
Edit: Just days after the bill had passed for killer robots being used in life-or-death situations, San Francisco has reversed its plan.
Bibliography
¹Derico, Ben, and James Clayton. “San Francisco to Allow Police ‘Killer Robots’.” BBC News, BBC, 30 Nov. 2022, https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-63816454. Accessed 01 Dec. 2022.
²Boyette, Chris, and Zoe Sottile. “San Francisco Supervisors Vote to Allow Police to Use Robots to Kill.” CNN, Cable News Network, 30 Nov. 2022, https://edition.cnn.com/2022/11/30/us/san-francisco-police-remote-control-robots/index.html#:~:text=San%20Francisco%20supervisors%20vote%20to%20allow%20police%20to%20use%20robots%20to%20kill,-By%20Chris%20Boyette&text=The%20San%20Francisco%20Board%20of,lethal%20force%20in%20extraordinary%20circumstances. Accessed 02 Dec. 2022.
Asma-Sadeque, Samira. “San Francisco Police Propose Using Robots Capable of ‘Deadly Force’.” The Guardian, Guardian News and Media, 24 Nov. 2022, https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/nov/24/san-francisco-police-propose-using-robots-capable-of-deadly-force. Accessed 01 Dec. 2022.
Duret, Daphne. “What San Francisco’s Killer Robots Debate Tells Us about Policing.” The Marshall Project, The Marshall Project, 10 Dec. 2022, https://www.themarshallproject.org/2022/12/10/san-francisco-killer-robots-policing-debate. Accessed 11 Dec. 2022.
Har, Janie. “San Francisco Will Allow Police to Deploy Robots That Kill.” AP NEWS, Associated Press, 30 Nov. 2022, https://apnews.com/article/police-san-francisco-government-and-politics-d26121d7f7afb070102932e6a0754aa5. Accessed 02 Dec. 2022.
Morris, J.D., and Annie Vainshtein. “’Killer Robots’ Approved by S.F. for Extreme Cases. Here’s Why Critics Are Still Worried.” San Francisco Chronicle, San Francisco Chronicle, 29 Nov. 2022, https://www.sfchronicle.com/sf/article/S-F-could-approve-the-use-of-killer-robots-17618170.php. Accessed 01 Dec. 2022.
Shapiro, Ari, and Brianna Scott. “San Francisco Considers Allowing Law Enforcement Robots to Use Lethal Force.” NPR, NPR, 28 Nov. 2022, https://www.npr.org/2022/11/28/1139523832/san-francisco-considers-allowing-law-enforcement-robots-to-use-lethal-force. Accessed 01 Dec. 2022.
Stokel-Walker, Chris. “San Francisco Has Reversed Its Killer Robot Plan.” WIRED UK, WIRED UK, 7 Dec. 2022, https://www.wired.co.uk/article/san-francisco-police-killer-robots-ban. Accessed 09 Dec. 2022.
Tangermann, Victor. “San Francisco Cops Now Allowed to Use Robots to Kill People.” Futurism, Futurism, 30 Nov. 2022, https://futurism.com/the-byte/san-francisco-cops-allowed-use-robots-kill-people. Accessed 03 Dec. 2022.
Tran, Tony Ho. “San Francisco Cops Propose Using Killer Robots to Fight Crime.” The Daily Beast, The Daily Beast Company, 29 Nov. 2022, https://www.thedailybeast.com/san-francisco-cops-propose-using-killer-robots-to-fight-crime. Accessed 03 Dec. 2022.
Weber, Jesse, and Chad Ayers. “COP-Controlled Robots Authorized to Kill in San Francisco.” YouTube, Law&Crime Network, 1 Dec. 2022, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BzHqSaY0ZJ8. Accessed 04 Dec. 2022.
Wu, Daniel. “Can Police Use Robots to Kill? San Francisco Voted Yes.” The Washington Post, WP Company, 30 Nov. 2022, https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2022/11/30/san-francisco-police-robots-kill/. Accessed 03 Dec. 2022.




