Author Archives: 47590

air-purifying headphones

Reading Time: 3 minutes

active noise cancellation, spacial audio, ambient mode, or even adjustable bass, has grown in the headphones market in the past couple of years, and still are the top-notch features that every customer looks for. Now recently, Dyson, a multinational technology company, implemented a new potential feature that might be bizarre even to think of. Introducing the Dyson Zone, an over-ear headphone with an air-purifier attached, filtering the outside air and transmits towards your mouth and nose.

source: https://www.theverge.com/2022/12/8/23499843/dyson-zone-air-purifier-headphones-price-release-date

Now you might be wondering why there is such a feature like this upon headphones and why headphones in general. According to Dyson’s website itself, they address the issue of urban pollution world-wide. It is expected that 70% of the population lives in cities, and with the increase of urban populations, other problems arise. Traffic, transport, construction, are only a part of the problems that causes detrimental impact to the environment, resulting in worsening air quality and auditory noise (dyson website). How Dyson is planning to tackle this problem is with the Dyson Zone headphones. These over-the-ear headphones are designed to address both the problems of air quality and city noise.

AUDIO ASPECT:

  • Advanced noise cancellation: Dyson ANC system uses eight microphones which monitor surrounding noise 384,000 times a second, completely silencing the outside world.
  • full-spectrum audio: Dyson accomplishes a full range of audible frequences from 6hz – 21hz, making sure that the users can hear every note and word.
  • low sound distortion: achieving realistic detailed audio

POLLUTION ASPECT:

  • air purifier was built with 30 years of expertise in airflow, filtration, and deep understanding of indoor and outdoor quality.
  • electrostatic filters capture 99% of particle pollution as small as 0.1 microns.
  • Carbon filters to prevent acidic gases most associated with city pollution.

(both information of the aspects were taken from the dyson website)

General Information

stepping aside from the technical aspects of the headphones, lets talk general. These headphones offer 50 hours of battery life with active noise cancellation, or 4 hours including activated purification. Within 3 hours the headphones is charged up to 100%. Starting at a price of $949, Dyson will launch its first products in January 2023 starting in china, and will make it’s way to the UK, US, and more in March.

Opinions

My opinion on an innovative feature on such a common wearable technology to everyone is beneficial to an extent (2-sided). For the beneficial reasons, most of the people I know would always have some kind of wearable earphones/headphones to listen to while on public transport to reduce boredom, and coming from a country where pollution is among the worst, a combination of both air purifier and ANC are a great pair. However, I dislike the fact that prices are astronomically expensive. I understand that it takes a long enough time to produce such a product, hence why its expensive. But what about the more rural areas, where pollution is just as bad as cities, and most people can’t afford such prices just for headphones with an air purifier. Also, people typically purchases headphones for the aesthetics, which would be a big aesthetic adjustment with an air purifier across your face. You would look like a drippy super villain though.

What are your thoughts on these headphones? would it be something you would purchase in the near future?

Sources:

“Dyson ZoneTM: Dyson’s Entry into Audio.” Dyson.com, 2020, www.dyson.com/newsroom/news/product/dyson-zone-audio.

Alderson, Alex. “Dyson Zone: Price and Launch Window of Elaborate Over-Ear Headphones Confirmed.” Notebookcheck, Notebookcheck, 12 Dec. 2022, www.notebookcheck.net/Dyson-Zone-Price-and-launch-window-of-elaborate-over-ear-headphones-confirmed.674170.0.html.

Downfall of a recent-built AI technology?

Reading Time: 3 minutes

Let’s ask the small questions first. Have you ever programmed? It’s completely fine if you’ve never touched the surface of coding, but if you program, imagine this.. you are programming hundreds and thousands of lines of code at the tip of your fingertips. You end the day with a big ol’ yawn, get in the shower, and the shower thoughts commence. What if you can implement AI-Technology to make it code for you based on a readable language prompt?

image source:
https://voicebot.ai/2021/07/01/openai-and-github-unveil-new-copilot-ai-assistant-for-coding/

Crazy enough, technology is already 1 step ahead of us. Bill Gates, the founder of Microsoft, along with Github, recently released a self-generating computer code AI, called CoPilot. This innovative technology simply lets you type in any natural language prompt and convert it into lines of code across any programming language. Whether it is python, java, C#, or C++, CoPilot finishes the job you needed to be done. The program as of right now on the GitHub website only charges users $10/month or $100/year, with a bonus of 60 trial-days free of charge. For university students like us, CoPilot is 100% free.

“Early Bird” Statistics

Within only a month after releasing the AI in early June of 2022, Github sparked over 400,000 subscribers for CoPilot. Before that, over 1.2 million signed up during the preview period. According to ciodive.com, within the first few months of release, Microsoft is already aiming at taking a slice of the software market, which is set to grow around 21% by the end of this year (Torres, 2022).

While CoPilot AI is still in its early development stages, writing up to 35%-40% of your code is an immense percentage when programming longer projects. Furthermore, not only does CoPilot generate code based on your prompt, it allows code interpretation, meaning that the AI can explain unusual code in natural language.

What’s Happening?

So, what’s the catch? I’ll let you imagine this as well. Imagine working on your own programming language, working for years on end, and finally being able to publish your program to the public. Everything is going great and you’ve feel like you’re on top of the world, until a big company creates an AI. The AI uses your programming language in the process, and does not give you any credit for any of the original codes you’ve done, how would you feel?

That’s exactly what Matthew Butterick felt, a programmer, about the newly-released AI. Mr. Butterick is a programmer, writer, designer, and lawyer, who is suing the AI founders and filing lawsuits. Mr. Butterick claims that the AI is full of piracy due to their approach of the AI, which was analyzing billions of existing code on the internet. AI is not original, as claimed by Mr. Butterick. Even though on the surface level it seems alright, the AI does not acknlowedge the programmers who built the original code on the internet, in which Mr. Butterick is lawsuiting for. On the other hand, Microsoft’s counter-argument on these reasons was that shortly releasing CoPilot, Github’s chief executive claim’s that the codes that the AI interprets are “fair-use”.

Personally on some aspects I stand on Matthew Butterick’s side due to the fact that programmer’s had actually taken years to fully make their code useable, and just for an AI to fully use it without recognition of the programmer, it ruins their recognition. However, at the end of the day, is anyone really original as they claim to be? Let me possibly ask you and everyone else that programs:

Are you where you are today, a successful programmer, maybe because you’re a natural, or also because of looking/studying other people’s code examples?

My argument against Matthew Butterick’s argument is simple:

if human’s can use other people’s code for personal benefit and without explicit consent, so can AI.

Im highly interested in your thoughts on this. Is CoPilot’s approach on interpreting code morally right? Feel free to counter-argue my opinions, I am eager to read all your opinions on it 🙂

Sources:

“Lawsuit Takes Aim at the Way A.I. Is Built.” The New York Times, 2022, www.nytimes.com/2022/11/23/technology/copilot-microsoft-ai-lawsuit.html#commentsContainer.

Wiggers, Kyle. “Copilot, GitHub’s AI-Powered Programming Assistant, Is Now Generally Available.” TechCrunch, 21 June 2022, techcrunch.com/2022/06/21/copilot-githubs-ai-powered-programming-assistant-is-now-generally-available/.

Torres, Roberto. “GitHub Copilot Adds 400K Subscribers in First Month.” CIO Dive, Aug. 2022, www.ciodive.com/news/github-copilot-microsoft-software-developer/628587/.

An Alternative Blue Bird App.

Reading Time: 3 minutes
source image: TheGuardian.com

Let’s be honest here, what is the main purpose of your time when scrolling through Twitter? Is it meticulously reading the upcoming news about voting elections? Probably not. Is it scrolling through the infinite waves of memes about anything that faces interest on the surface of Twitter? Probably so. On October 27, 2022, Elon musk officially purchased twitter for $44 billion dollars. He is now facing a rebellion from users due to major misinformation and hate speech that rose on Twitter. Recently, Elon Musk posted tweets regarding negative comments about a social media application named “Mastodon” before deleting them. Now, here’s the question, why would one of the top 5 richest people on earth, who own a billion-dollar company, target such a small known media application?

Mastodon

Mastodon was created in 2016 by software developer Eugen Rochko, whose aim is to create a “free open source decentralised media platform”. The media application’s name was inspired by the extinction of mammals and elephants. Mastodon’s ‘unique-selling point’ as a social media is that it collects hundreds of active social networks around the world connected by Mastodon’s technology. With those linked servers, you can sign up to a specific server, each with its own regulations made by whoever set it up. You can also create your own servers, with personalized regulations and topics of choice of your interest for others to join and discuss. In addition, you can follow multiple servers that interest you. Quite a bit of user has fled the Twitter platform to experience life under the Mastodon platform. Mastodon attained over 450,000+ user’s in less than two weeks, with an active community of 1+ million users, according to CNN (Huang, 2022). This was frankly the reason why Elon Musk went on to form his tweets. For comparison, there are reported 206+ million active users in late 2022 (Shepard, 2022).

What’s Similar?

  1. Posting – Posting “toots” through Mastodon is basically the same for Twitter, however, you have in total of 500 characters to write down whatever is on your mind. Moreover, you have more control over who can view your posts. The trending hashtag’s on Mastodon are basically identical to Twitter.
  2. Layout – the user interface for Mastodon and Twitter is pretty much the same, however, a little more complex due to having multiple servers for users to browse instead of one.

Now, as a non-active Twitter user, I have decided to join the trend and try out Mastodon myself. I wanted to experience what the hype was all about. Let’s say, as much as I don’t like using Twitter for daily use, Mastodon has created such a difficult time utilizing its features. Here are my personal reasons;

Opinions

First and foremost, finding the users of the application is a struggle. I dislike the fact that it’s basically a hassle to find friends among the servers I followed. Finding friends within the servers is easy, but among different servers, it’s practically impossible. I refuse to believe how new users can find other user’s without having a complete manual of how to use Mastodon. Social media platforms are supposed to be easy to use, not a puzzling case to solve.

Secondly, creating your own servers is more complicated. Making one according to CNN, you need to host it yourself, it is required to have a website, a virtual computer system connected to the internet, and an email provider. Additionally, you are required to install security protocols and programming languages. These requirements take time to make and for users like myself, I don’t see a reason to waste my time on things like this.

Adding a spotlight for users who tried Mastodon, also have relatively similar thoughts when using the platform. “It wasn’t easy and intuitive”, and “it was very boring there, and very smug”, according to the feedback made by frequent social media users.

To synthesize all this information, Mastodon is considered to be an alternative use for Twitter, after billionaire Elon Musk publicly announced his negativity towards Mastodon. New features of the social media application appear to intrigue new-coming users, as a 400,000 active-user increase boosted the company’s brand image over the weeks. As a curious person, I have decided to try out the application myself, and overall generated more negative feedback than positive. As for my final words, I believe that Mastodon and any other twitter-related applications won’t be going anywhere anytime soon based on user feedback.

But I am interested in your opinions on Mastodon. Have you tried it? How do you feel about it? If so, please describe your experience in the comments, I would love to hear your thoughts about such an application!

Bibliography:

Huang, Kalley. “What Is Mastodon and Why Are People Leaving Twitter for It?” The New York Times, 7 Nov. 2022, www.nytimes.com/2022/11/07/technology/mastodon-twitter-elon-musk.html. Accessed 8 Nov. 2022.

Shepard, Jack. “22 Essential Twitter Statistics You Need to Know in 2022.” TheSocialShepard, 5 Nov. 2022, thesocialshepherd.com/blog/twitter-statistics#:~:text=In%20fact%2C%20Twitter%20sees%20about,what%20others%20are%20tweeting%20about. Accessed 8 Nov. 2022.

Tagged

Tiktok – a miniature version of youtube, and a search engine?

Reading Time: 3 minutes

Imagine Google, one of the world’s most superior search engines, slowly losing its users due to an application made for viral dance videos and pop music.

You heard me. For those who don’t know, Tiktok is basically an alternative to the youtube media platform that allows users to create videos, stories, and comments with many other features creators can utilize. According to DemandSage.com, Tiktok is well on its track to advance past 1.8 billion active users worldwide at the end of 2022. Almost a 700million-user increase since the start of the year (Ruby, 2022). With that being said, one of the main reasons why the media platform is at its peak is the online communities that are built around it. Generation Z (people who are born between 1997-2012) has been an era where communication and overall communities are closer than they ever have been before. I personally believe that Tiktok unveiled its use of technology to create such a close community of young adults, synthesizing information with one another.

Source of image

Let me explain in further detail. Tiktok, most of its users being young adults, prefer to look for something and hope to find a result that isn’t a whole essay to read or a 30-minute video. Tiktok is just the place for this, as videos last under 60 seconds with full detail by recent users. As a TikTok user, I agree that sometimes looking for an answer on Tiktok just might be more effective than searching through google in terms of speed. Technology-wise, Tiktok has been using high-tech artificial intelligence technology to find similar videos users view on a daily basis. According to ankursnewsletter, there is built-in AI like computer vision, natural processing language, and metadata to detect the kind of content the video is. Based on the user’s page, the application recommends them similar videos (Patel, 2022).

Based on the statistics provided and looking at where TikTok will be headed in the next couple of years, I believe that the community will only grow in size, which means that the use of the media platform as a “search engine” will continuously increase. However, I also believe that there is a general line between TikTok information and google information. As mentioned before, Tiktok’s community consists of young adults 18-24, according to Sensor Tower, while Google’s community is used by a wide range of ages. When you use the search engine on any platform, have you ever wondered while reading, “Is the information displayed on this website legitimate?”. Fact-checking your information is tough enough through google, but what about Tiktok? How would you know it’s true? Wouldn’t it be a hassle to fact-check AGAIN from another search engine to see if what you read was actually true? A part of me also believes that Tiktok should stay as it is now because of the community that has structured it; a media platform to entertain users and a simple search engine for common knowledge questions.

Sometimes searching for something a quicker time would do the job for people who don’t want to go through 30-minute videos or 3000-word essays just to look for a one-sentence answer. However, people should consider what makes information from a quick TikTok video legitimate, or if all of it is just a lie. This is why I believe that there are balanced opinions between the pros and the cons of Tiktok as an alternative search engine.

Sources:

Huang, Kelly. “For Gen Z, TikTok Is the New Search Engine.” The New York Times, 17 Sept. 2022, www.nytimes.com/2022/09/16/technology/gen-z-tiktok-search-engine.html. Accessed 21 Oct. 2022.

Patel, Ankur A. “How TikTok Uses AI to Engineer User Addiction.” Ankurs Newsletter, 13 May 2022, www.ankursnewsletter.com/p/how-tiktok-uses-ai-to-engineer-user. Accessed 21 Oct. 2022.

Ruby, Daniel. “TikTok User Statistics (2022): How many TikTok Users Are There?” Demand Sage, 19 Aug. 2022, https://www.demandsage.com/tiktok-user-statistics/. Accessed 21 Oct. 2022

CV-2X Technology in Vehicles. Will it Finally Reduce Transportation Catastrophes?

Reading Time: 2 minutes

Every day that passes by, there are drivers, taxis, or pedestrians on the sidewalk who seems to be unaware of their surroundings and seconds later, resulting in disasters that can’t be changed. As a soon-to-be driver entering the roads of transportation, I suggest that having an extra layer of technological protection would save the life of many beginners, intermediate, or even expert drivers.

Manufacturers are trying to release what is called a CV-2X system which will ultimately connect vehicles with other vehicles, notify and react if there is any abnormal behavior. One major point to why I am eager for the production of CV-2X is sensors that can detect school buses or pedestrians from afar, giving the driver time to react. Pedestrians, especially kids, are very unaware of what’s happening on the road. Personally, I believe the health of others on the road, as well as oneself, are equally important, therefore a change in this aspect will enhance safety and give drivers the confidence they need. 

A quote stated by the vice president at Harman International, Ram Iyer, is another argument to believe why I am in favor of the upcoming technological changes in the future. “Because the human attention span is decreasing, you’ll look for these technologies to save your life.” (Iyer, 2022). Human attention span from the looks of it might be minor, but it is critical when it comes to driving. A few seconds of delay off the roads and you can end up in an unwanted situation. Industries that use technology focused on issues like attention span will definitely save lives when put into use.

On the other hand, we need to think about the current situation of our society. With many new releases of technologies enhancing various aspects of life, I believe we are still at the stage of trial and error. Technology, especially the CV-2X system, has to be fully finalized without error. Solely relying on CV-2X for driving, do we ever really look at the system malfunction or incorrect detections. Those types of errors can never be caught by the driver’s eye and can cause fatal accidents all over again.

From my standpoint, the release of technology to solve major issues like car crashes, still have a lot to be improved on before utilizing it on a global scale. Whether or not technology is the solution to reduce the number of catastrophes on the roads, there are always some kinds of errors to be developed before use.

Source: NY times

References:

Taub, Eric A. “Hello, Fellow Car. We’ve Got a Problem. Let’s Talk.” The New York Times, 5 Oct. 2022, www.nytimes.com/2022/10/05/business/c-v2x-car-communication-technology.html. Accessed 8 Oct. 2022.