Author Archives: Janek123PL

The use of drones in Indian agriculture

Reading Time: 3 minutes

For many years, the Indian agriculture has been lagging behind an don’t adapting to changing world and technology. In India, the agriculture sector plays a vital role in the society as it contributes to 18% of Indian GDP and is a primary source of livelihood for around 58% of the country’s population mainly due to large percentage of people living in rural areas. In the era of globalisation and new innovations, Indian tech start-ups became to mushroom especially in the agriculture sector to come up with idea of optimising this branch of the economy, catching up with rest of the world and increasing the efficiency of this farms. They invented drones-helpers who fly above the farm spreading the pesticides hanged below them in a container. It is incredibly efficient as it is affordable, easier accessible than many workers and it takes a third of a time of a human worker to finish the job. The Indian innovators say that this is not the end of their work and that in the future the robots would be able to make crop analysis like crop growth, plant seeds or water the plants.

In a developed country, the agriculture sector should remain a small fraction of the total GDP – most of it should consist of services. People working in the agriculture usually spend their whole lives there and do not contribute to moving the nation’s innovation and progress forward – therefore do not bring any higher change to the nation. If a larger proportion of a society works in this sector it means that many people would not only not contribute much to the society but also that their primary source of income and wellbeing would depend on how much crops would grow or how the job market looks like at the moment. To combat this problem, Indian star-ups came up with idea of using drones as helpers, to help the Indian farmers save the time, maxims profits, allow them to potentially increase their farms due to more time and most importantly to save unnecessary cheap labour used in farm help in watering plants or collecting crops.

But how the drone works? Well, first of all it has to analyse the whole area of a farm to set the boundaries where it should fly – therefore there has to be some visible point as the limits of the farm so the drone don’t get lost. Then, when the data is uploaded to the system and GPS, the drone can began to be autonomous and fly using patterns from the analysis. And lastly through collected data It can 3D map the whole farm and perform a task.

In terms of what the drone can do there are some things for now. Firstly, it can monitor the irrigation. By using thermal, hyper spectral and multispectral sensors it can recognise whether a plant is too dry and then report the status to the farmer. By this the water efficiency can be improved as a farmer would know which crop needs water the most or which crop should one get rid of, as it is dying. As I mentioned before, the drone can see the health of a plant by different scanners. First, it can detect bacterial of fungal plagues in the early stage and the general appearance of a plant that might suggest its poor condition. This might be especially useful for farmers with thousands or hundred thousand plant, as they don’t have time to check every plant. After finding a dying plant, the drone can adapt this knowledge to the database making it more accurate every other time. More importantly, the drone can do agricultural spraying which limits human contact with harmful chemicals to a minimum. As it is stated in the article

– ‘Professionals say that aerial spraying is five times faster with drones when compared to other methods.’

This technology can undoubtedly help not only Indian economy but also the whole agricultural sector as it speeds up work and maximise the efficiency. More people would then have time and resources to increase their education level and therefore to be able to work in many services related jobs, which is an integral part of advanced societies – large GDP proportion consist of services. It would also limit the poverty and increase the wealth of the citizens. The projects could also bring more investors and this prototype could be used by a base by Indian scientist and technicians for more advanced drones that could one day be doctors or builders.

Sources:

  1. https://www.bbc.com/news/av/world-asia-india-64248510
  2. https://vtindia.in/the-benefits-of-drones-in-agriculture/
  3. https://www.equinoxsdrones.com/blog/importance-of-drone-technology-in-indian-agriculture-farming
  4. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/business/budget/union-budget-2023-agriculture-sector-needs-fresh-fodder-to-improve-farmer-incomes/articleshow/97458359.cms
  5. https://omifoundation.medium.com/til-gdp-versus-jobs-92186a6bbbf6

Batteries from trees

Reading Time: 3 minutes

The world moves toward a cleaner future or at least it seems like it does. Recently, many countries declared to ban on diesel cars as a strategy to combat climate change and as a result of this, motivation to purchase an electric vehicle. Electric vehicles have seen a major rise in demand in recent years and the number is going to skyrocket with the diesel restrictions and strong advertising on ‘greener’ transportation means. Yet, many critics have noticed that the batteries in electric cars are not only short-lasting but need to be replaced after several years which is not only pricey but also creates a waste of raw materials that were used for battery construction. Stora Enso, a Finnish paper mill company, realised that nowadays we use lesser and lesser in our daily life due to digitalisation. They decided to connect the problem of batteries and leftovers of paper production to create a plan of batteries coming from trees, and more directly speaking from the lignin from the paper pulp.

Stora Enso claims to be one of the largest if not the largest private forest company in the world, having many resources needed for paper production. Their idea is to use lignin which is ‘the glue in the trees that kind of glues the cellulose fibres together and also makes the trees very stiff’, as Lauri Lehtonen explains, the main thinker behind the idea of a lignin-based battery solution. Lignin is a polymer which means that it contains carbon which then is a great source for crucial parts in batteries commonly called an anode. Because during the processing of wood, a lot of waste pulp is being created, the Finnish company decided to extract carbon from this pulp to make this significant material for battery anodes and plans with the partnership of a Swedish company they want to already start the production as early as by 2025.

The idea comes from the observations of the world’s market of vehicles where it is expected that the market for batteries in coming years will increase significantly. Moreover, the critics of electric cars often mention the process of extracting lithium which is used to create the batteries for electric cars. Extraction is an industrial process that damages the environment and involves mining. Some of the materials that are within a battery are also toxic, or not recyclable. The positive thing about the batteries coming from trees is that companies declared that they do not wish to cut any new trees or increase the demand for paper manufacturing to get more pulp – they will use what already exists. It is a highly ecological method that provides a green perspective for batteries. In the future, there might be a concern about how strict the regulations are going to be in this sector in terms of cutting new trees, as if this market branch would explode it would automatically increase the demand for waste paper pulp, therefore increasing demand for trees. 

Even though the idea sounds futuristic, the first invention of paper power was discovered in 2007 in the US. Since then, scientists concluded a few points of weaknesses and strengths of such energy mean. First, in the fall, there is environmental influence. The production of paper batteries does not generate any pollution like toxic metal pollutants and the disposal of such batteries is also much more eco-friendly. Secondly, there is no threat of leakage of dangerous chemical substances in a battery as there is none in a paper one. Moreover, they are ultra-thin, flexible, and light which makes them perfect for many devices in every branch of life. More importantly, they can be used in extreme weather ranging from -73 to 143 degrees of Celsius. On the other hand, some sources say that introducing them on a global scale would take 30 to 70 years, therefore it might be slightly too futuristic, yet the Finnish company, mentioned above, might find in the future a more realistic and quicker way of introducing it. 

Bibliography:

  1. https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20221215-the-batteries-made-from-wood
  2. https://www.how2shout.com/technology/paper-battery-vs-conventional-battery-difference.html
  3. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/paper-battery-future-renewable-energy-snehashis-paul
  4. https://usharama.edu.in/blogDetail/paper-battery

The phenomenon of hydrogen buses

Reading Time: 5 minutes

In the era of the upcoming climate and energetic crisis, we look for new strategies and alternatives for our current ways of living. Fossil fuels contribute greatly to carbon emissions and the enormous number of private vehicles polluting the Earth and draining our limited raw resources. Out of the combination of switching fuel to green alternatives and limiting the usage of cars the ecological buses were brought to life. The most common type is currently an electric bus that is present in many ACs, offering a new future for shared transport. The researchers were yet interested in a wider range of alternatives as we cannot rely on only one source of green energy, especially when nowadays prices of energy are rocketing. The concept of fueling buses with hydrogen is an innovative idea that would allow buses to travel for longer distances, have shorter loading (or fueling) time and be almost zero-pollution vehicles. However, there are voices that this idea might be too futuristic for our current standards and that most of the ways of producing hydrogen, in reality, contribute a lot to carbon emissions into the atmosphere.

In November 2022, the cooperation of the city of Lublin, the university of Lublin and the german bus company decided to combine forces in inventing their hydrogen bus that would be tested on the streets of Lublin and then after successful results there are plans to create a factory that would be responsible for distributing hydrogen buses all over Europe. The creators are promoting the benefits of the bus as it is quiet and emits almost no pollution. It was stated that it is better than the electric bus because it has a longer possible range, with no problem with the utilisation of batteries (like with electric buses). They claim that buses are the technology of the future and that it is the visionary response of the city in combating the usage of petrol as a fuel. The Chief Technical Officer of the bus company that cooperates with the university said

‘there are different types of hydrogen that can be produced and showed our vision of how would we manage the supply process. We plan to place a photovoltaic farm along with energy storage units and electrolysers so that we will be able to physically produce hydrogen on-site at the depot and use it in public transport’

He predicts that the production of hydrogen which requires nowadays a lot of energy would still be cheaper than using petrol. 

How does a hydrogen bus work? - eCity powered by Solaris
https://ecity.solarisbus.com/en/e-mobility/how-does-a-hydrogen-bus-work

The hydrogen used as a fuel is still in its infant phase stage so it should be clear that the technology has a lot to offer but lacks many components to operate well in the real world. The benefits it brings are undoubtedly its environmental cleanness – zero noise, zero carbon footprint, and zero visual pollution. That is crucial in combat with rising temperatures making them a perfect substitution or alternative to electric buses. Secondly, the engine or storing the energy. The huge disadvantage of electric vehicles is that they need to be charged for at least a few hours to be fully charged, whereas hydrogen buses can be tanked in less than 5 minutes. That means the buses can be as flexible as conventional vehicles and ecological at the same time. Quick fueling and stronger engines that provide a similar range to the petrol cars would make them the perfect means of transport of the future – long-distance, carbon-free mass transports. Last but not least, introducing hydrogen buses on a global scale or a national one would mean the democratisation of the power supply. What is meant by that is that it would make countries less dependent on fossil fuels which are required for energy and power and therefore help the many countries with their strong bonds to the main exporters of fossil fuels. That might also be a first step in breaking global cartels like OPEC because, in theory, everybody would be able to produce hydrogen within a country’s borders. This would lead to stable prices if well managed and prevent global fuel prices as it happened to petrol after the Russian invasion of Ukraine.

On the other hand, critics say that this technology is too futuristic as we miss the key storage infrastructure and our methods of extracting hydrogen are in reality harmful to the environment. Firstly, there are a few ways to produce hydrogen. Currently, most of the hydrogen is being extracted from fossil fuels (grey hydrogen), therefore generating a lot of toxic emissions into the atmosphere. The reason why we don’t use green hydrogen is the method that ‘uses an electrical current to separate the hydrogen from the oxygen in the water. If this electricity is obtained from renewable sources we will, therefore, produce energy without emitting carbon dioxide into the atmosphere.’ Unfortunately, this method is highly expensive which is why global companies prefer to extract fossil fuels, which contradicts the green mission they envoy. Secondly, the cost of raw materials required in the early that combine into catalysers and electrolysers like platinum and iridium are high which makes it harder for medium and small companies to enter this market and switch to using this type of energy. There is also a lack of infrastructure required for this technology, as no charging stations or storage are making implementing this technology even more expensive. Moreover, hydrogen is extremely flammable which creates a safety issue for the passengers and the whole industry. 

To sum it up, the future vision of hydrogen buses is promising, yet there are many improvements and investments needed. The producers and scientists should focus on extracting hydrogen from pure electrolysis which separates hydrogen from water and their mission should be to achieve this at the lowest cost, so it is more affordable than extracting from fossil fuels. If all of the corrections were implemented, the world could become more energy and power independent and take another step in lowering climate change. The admiration of hydrogen buses, in my opinion, is too optimistic right now but more people will hear about it more investors could be attracted and therefore make the progress of this technology quicker.

Bibliography:

  1. https://www.twi-global.com/technical-knowledge/faqs/what-are-the-pros-and-cons-of-hydrogen-fuel-cells
  2. https://www.wired.com/story/future-buses-hydrogen-electric/
  3. https://www.ibigroup.com/ibi-insights/the-pros-cons-and-other-strategic-considerations-of-battery-electric-beb-versus-hydrogen-fuel-cell-electric-fceb-buses/
  4. https://www.iberdrola.com/sustainability/green-hydrogen
  5. https://radio.lublin.pl/2022/11/to-technologia-przyszlosci-autobus-wodorowy-testowany-na-ulicach-lublina-zdjecia/
Tagged ,

Using artificial intelligence to spot breast cancer

Reading Time: 4 minutes

Breast cancer is one of the modern world diseases that greatly influence women’s lives (0,5%-1% of the cases occur to men) with a high death rate – in 2020 out of 2.3 million women with breast cancer, 685 000 of them died. It is the most frequently diagnosed cancer among women worldwide. The key to combatting it in the early stage is by screening however the current methods as self-checking or mammalogy are seen as not accurate enough due to women’s unawareness of proper screening methods or the stigma of being physically tested by a doctor. With the rise of the importance of AI and women’s irritation, new possible solutions started to be introduced around the world. 

In 2016, Geetha Manjunath, a data analyst from India, lost her cousin who died out of breast cancer. Geetha blamed the mammology method as it didn’t discover breast cancer in time. She stated that mammographs have high difficulties in discovering cancer among young women and that there needs to be some improvements. 

“As I was working with multiple image modalities for other projects at Xerox, I chanced upon thermal imaging.” – Geetha Manjunath said.

She came up with the idea of combing thermal screening with AI. The whole process consists of thermal scanning the women and then comparing the results to the already existing pictures of patients with cancer with the help of AI to analyse loads of past cases and asses whether a pattern on a thermal picture could be a sign of early-stage breast cancer. Another advantage of Geetha’s project called Thermalytix is that is affordable, which is a major game-changer in a country like India where a lot of women are not affluent enough to be able to spend their savings on breast cancer screening. Another key factor, especially among young women is privacy. During the visit, nobody touches the patient and the doctor only sees a thermal image of the chest on the screen. It is also radiation-free and non-invasive so it doesn’t hurt and is not harmful to the body. So far, Geetha has screened over 75 000 women across India and plans to expand her innovative idea. Her mission is to make access to screening to every woman on the globe with the current progress of introducing her methods into countries like the Philippines and Kenya. She also started creating camps in poor areas of India to help poor women detect the disease before it’s too late, as they are the most vulnerable. 

Yet, researchers alarm that in the current stage the are some challenges to using AI in screening breast cancer. Firstly, AI databases are currently limited in comparison to the desired accuracy – AI bases its prediction on the pictures that are already in the database, therefore any new cancer pattern or any other abnormalities might be not registered by AI. Secondly, the electronic medical database is still not fully updated and well organised in many countries, even those well-developed as well. It leads to poor sources for AI to create the right prediction. There would also be a need for a global medical easy-access software system for all of the hospitals, which is extremely hard to organise on a worldwide and national scale. Moreover, there would have to be some social trust towards the doctors who would be making their decisions based on AI results which might nowadays rise some doubts and reluctance. Following that, hospitals would have to make special training for the doctors to implement using AI in screening breast cancer which takes time and money.

https://www.kpwashingtonresearch.org/news-and-events/blog/2020/artificial-intelligence-aiding-not-replacing-radiologists

The method is visionary and promising as it creates a comfortable way of detecting breast cancer conducted by a professional. It could minimise the scope of the problem drastically, helping all no matter their financial background. Yet, due to its early stage, there are some limitations as relatively small databases, the low popularity of medical data stored on the internet in many third-world countries and the question of AI deciding our health. Nonetheless, I believe there is a great future with this method and the right people and funds it can revolutionise the world.

Bibliography:

https://www.cureus.com/articles/106594-artificial-intelligence-in-breast-cancer-screening-and-diagnosis

https://www.cureus.com/articles/106594-artificial-intelligence-in-breast-cancer-screening-and-diagnosis

https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/breast-cancer

https://www.bbc.com/news/av/stories-63755128

Tagged ,

Controversies with nuclear power around Europe

Reading Time: 3 minutes
https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/energy-crisis-revives-nuclear-power-plans-globally-2022-08-04/

The war in Ukraine and the reduced influx of gas coming into Europe from Russia made electricity prices rocket. It is estimated that the prices will stay high until 2024 which is going to be tough for many people. This arrived in a worldwide debate about the significance of using renewable sources of energy. One of them is nuclear power which is seen as one of the most efficient ones and the best possible out of every source of energy we know so far. Yet, there are voices that the cost of them is highly expensive and because of that, we cannot base the whole electricity market on it, as it is not profitable in the short-term (as the building process takes years) and it does not leave sustainable opportunities when the nuclear plants are not operating.

Firstly, to produce nuclear power uranium is needed. It is often forgotten that uranium is not a common material and most European countries import it from Russia. Russia is the second biggest exporter of uranium, right after Nigeria. Cutting off export significantly affects the nuclear plants and therefore even the electricity market in countries that rely on nuclear power a lot, like France. Therefore, the use of nuclear power is not independent enough to be the main source of national energy which many green activists or states promote.

Secondly, the overtake of the Ukrainian nuclear plant in the Zaporizhzhia region by Russian forces raises fears about the weaponization of nuclear power which stand as an alarming problem for the future. Not only does it paralyse the country’s electricity but it creates a potential ‘uncontrolled nuclear reaction in a nuclear reactor could result in widespread contamination of air and water.’ Fabian Lüscher, who is the head of the nuclear energy section at the Swiss Energy Foundation claims that ‘ Europe’s ageing nuclear fleet is not adapted to deal with contemporary terrorist attacks and cyberattacks.’ His quote and the Russian occupation of the nuclear facility create a question of whether nuclear plants nowadays are truly as safe as they are described in public and what can we do about this problem. So far, the problem has not been raised in the public with greater success.

https://www.chathamhouse.org/2022/08/attacks-ukraine-nuclear-plant-whats-stake

In addition, the main problem raised by the activists is waste. They claim that because nuclear-powered countries powered are interlinked when they transfer between each other energy there are ‘risks of nuclear accidents extending across borders.’ Moreover, because of the hazardous features of the waste, it creates a threat to the environment as it stays hazardous for thousands of years until it decays from being radioactive. Yet, the statistics say something different about the danger that the waste present. The health issue associated with nuclear waste is not a problem as the radiation never harm people in nuclear history moreover the crucial part is that the potential contact with the waste either by the environment or a human would not be harmful because the world we live in is already radioactive at the acceptable levels and the potential leak of radiation would be 50 times smaller than the environmental one. In addition, out of all of the waste that is produced 90% is classified as low-level waste which is ‘lightly-contaminated items, such as tools and work clothing, and contains only 1% of the total radioactivity.’

War in Ukraine pushed some countries to speed up their plans by relying more of their energy on nuclear plants, like Poland. The lack of gas and coal supply coming out of Russia posed a higher need for other means of energy. This approach would significantly reduce Poland’s carbon emissions as it is ranked one of the most carbon emission countries in the world, placing the 20th place. On the other hand, experts say that the use of nuclear energy promises is based mainly politically, as there are upcoming elections and the government tries to distract the public from the rising energy prices and give them hope as it cannot provide cheaper prices. It shows that plans for nuclear energy cannot be made during a crisis and that in times of shortages of energy or problems with the usage of the facilities (militarization or renovation) nuclear power is useless.

Bibliography:
https://www.bbc.com/news/business-63245112
https://www.statista.com/statistics/1147442/imports-of-uranium-to-eu-by-country/
https://world-nuclear.org/nuclear-essentials/what-is-nuclear-waste-and-what-do-we-do-with-it.aspx
https://www.dw.com/en/poland-chooses-us-company-to-build-its-first-nuclear-power-plant/a-63591358
https://www.worldometers.info/co2-emissions/co2-emissions-by-country/

Pictures:

https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/energy-crisis-revives-nuclear-power-plans-globally-2022-08-04/

https://www.chathamhouse.org/2022/08/attacks-ukraine-nuclear-plant-whats-stake

Tagged